This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
infttrace vs add_thread
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:38:14 -0700
- Subject: infttrace vs add_thread
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
When add_thread was changed to accept a ptid_t type instead of just an
integer, nobody updated infttrace.c to reflect those changes.
The net result is a segfault if you try to use GDB on hpux11.
Again, since I'm no longer a GDB maintainer, I'll hold off installing the
fix until approved by a GDB maintainer.
* infttrate.c (child_acknowledge_created_inferior): Pass
correct argument to add_thread.
(update_thread_state_after_attach): Likewise.
Index: infttrace.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/cvsfiles/devo/gdb/infttrace.c,v
retrieving revision 2.22
diff -c -3 -p -r2.22 infttrace.c
*** infttrace.c 2001/09/30 19:16:20 2.22
--- infttrace.c 2001/12/18 17:50:01
*************** child_acknowledge_created_inferior (int
*** 3123,3129 ****
* the process safely to ask what it is. Anyway, we'll
* add it when it gets the EXEC event.
*/
! add_thread (pid); /* in thread.c */
/* We can now set the child's ttrace event mask.
*/
--- 3123,3129 ----
* the process safely to ask what it is. Anyway, we'll
* add it when it gets the EXEC event.
*/
! add_thread (pid_to_ptid (pid)); /* in thread.c */
/* We can now set the child's ttrace event mask.
*/
*************** update_thread_state_after_attach (int pi
*** 4764,4770 ****
}
}
! add_thread (tid); /* in thread.c */
}
#ifdef PARANOIA
--- 4764,4770 ----
}
}
! add_thread (pid_to_ptid (pid)); /* in thread.c */
}
#ifdef PARANOIA