This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Fix PR gdb/265, 64-bit pointers in Java
- From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, per at bothner dot com
- Date: 11 Feb 2002 11:47:20 -0700
- Subject: Re: Fix PR gdb/265, 64-bit pointers in Java
- References: <20020211003818.A26546@nevyn.them.org>
- Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com
>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
Daniel> I don't know if Java allows the implicit 0x123456789 ->
Daniel> 0x123456789L conversion that we all know and love in C
Nope. In Java an integer constant which is too big for its type is an
error.
Daniel> but it certainly behooves us to act that way on the command
Daniel> line.
If/when we implement method invocation, won't this mean we could
silently call the wrong overloaded method?
Tom