This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] make MIPS sim mips.igen model names one per line.
At Mon, 11 Feb 2002 16:58:51 -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > In this case, I fail to see how _mixing_ them in mips.igen for a
> > single set of ISAs (the standars mipsI ... mipsIV, and soon to be
> > mips32, mips64), is the right thing.
> >
> > One way or the other, I think it should be consistent at least for the
> > MIPS ISA 'models'. There's no reason to have inconsistency.
>
> Yes, the debate over this patch occured long ago. My memory is that it
> was agreed that the standard MIPS defined variants should all appear on
> a single line but specific ISA implementations got to have their own line
If that's the way people want to go, I can do that, but:
(1) that is directly in opposition to what you indicated was your
preference in December 2000 (see the mail I fwded you 8-), and
(2) I think it'll be easier for Eric to do his mips32/mips64 merge,
then subsequently for me to merge the mipsV changes we have here,
if it's one-per-line. (In addition to being esier to get the file
into the one-per-line state to begin with. 8-)
I just want agreement one way or another, so i can make it so. 8-)
cgd