This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfa:testsuite} Overhaul sizeof.exp
- From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- To: fnasser at redhat dot com
- Cc: ac131313 at cygnus dot com, drow at mvista dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 11:49:47 -0600
- Subject: Re: [rfa:testsuite} Overhaul sizeof.exp
It sounds like we understand the alternatives and everyone's got opinions
about them.
[0] Status quo
[1] FAIL the test
[2] XFAIL the test
[3] KFAIL the test
I'm concerned that for each alternative, someone will find a flaw, and
therefore we'll stick with [0] and keep rejecting useful tests.
Fernando and Daniel and Andrew, I'd like to hold your feet to the fire:
Can you please rank these in priority order and indicate how many of the
high priority ones are acceptable.
Also there may very well be a [4] that I haven't heard of or thought of.
My rank is [2] > [1] > [3] > [0]. [2], [1], and [3] are acceptable to me.
[0] is not.
Michael C