This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Bugfixes on x86-64 target

>> x86-64          (--target=x86_64-linux-gnu broken)
>>                 Michal Ludvig           mludvig@suse.cz
> 
>> Andrew Cagney wrote:
>>> Andrew Cagney wrote:
>>> Can I suggest adding your self to the maintainers file as an obvious fix (don't forget to post the patch).
> 
>> Oops, sorry.  I was thinking of write-after-approval.
> Is it wrong? Can I remove the "broken" word? The target is not
> broken when compiled natively.

Sorry which, maintainer or broken?

With respect to maintenance, I wrote something that could be interpreted 
in several different ways.  I'm very sorry for this misunderstanding. 
You contributed a (correct?) patch, had an assignment on hand and hence 
ment the criteria for write-after-approval.

A target should always be buildable as a cross.  The other native-only 
target is HP/UX and that is also considered broken.

Andrew
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]