This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH RFA/RFC] Don't use lwp_from_thread() in thread_db_wait()


> On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 12:37:08PM -0500, David Taylor wrote:
> 
>> > Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 11:23:31 -0500
>> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
> 
>> 
> 
>> > Yes, that could probably be arranged.  Someday we should talk to a
>> > vendor of an M:N threads package and see what we have to work with.  I
>> > don't know of any offhand besides NGPT.
> 
>> 
>> If I understand you correctly, then: Solaris.
> 
> 
> Is it really?

Yep.

> To clarify, LinuxThreads has one thread per process; IBM's NGPT has
> multiple threads per process, but still multiple processes.  I was
> under the impression that Solaris LWPs would have all threads in one
> process.

That was their first attempt (if I remember right).

> (except of course the terminology gets fuzzy here.  One "process" in
> Solaris includes multiple LWPs which can be executing at the same time. 
> If my understanding above is correct it might be more appropriate to
> call Solaris one-thread-per-LWP).

enjoy,
Andrew




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]