This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Let dwarf2 CFI's execute_stack_op be used outside of CFI
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- To: Daniel Berlin <dan at dberlin dot org>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, rms at gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 12:48:09 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Let dwarf2 CFI's execute_stack_op be used outside of CFI
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0203251909360.6911-100000@dberlin.org>
[I'm sure Richard Stallman doesn't want to be dragged into such an
exchange, however]
Given there is currently a dispute over the origins of the file
dwarf2cfi.c, I'm removing it from GDB.
Once that dispute has been resolved, the file can, again be accepted.
I should note that resolving this will likely take time - Jiri is
currently uncontactable, so I'm going to to have to try to follow this
up with his peers.
sigh,
Andrew
> I also added my name to the top of the file, since in reality, it's based
>> > > on code I sent Jiri.
>
>> >
>> > I'd let Jiri make that decision.
>
>> No.
>> This is not his decision to make.
>> A lot of it is my code, unchanged (you can check the x86-64.org
>> repository, for the huge change that replaced his code with mine)
>> He never gave me any credit when he contributed it, for some reason,
>> probably because I never asked for it.
>> I've still got the email I sent him when he asked for the code, and i'm
>> sure he'd be happy to confirm he used it.
>>
>> >From a legal standpoint, while the copyright is transfered to the FSF, the
>> non-exclusive license they grant back to the contributors code should go
>> to me as well as Jiri, not just to Jiri. This is part of of the contract of the
>> copyright assignment with the FSF.
>> Thus, in order to ensure this is possible (not that i plan on using the
>> license for anything at the moment), i'm making sure it's clear that the
>> code contributed was not soley Jiri's.
>> So, that way, in the future, if I ever cared to license the code to
>> someone else, or do something with it, I can without someone asserting
>> it's only the FSF and Jiri's.
>
>
> Please be aware, by the way, that if you don't accept the change to the
> top of the file, i'll be forced to go bug RMS/the FSF about it, as I'm
> sure they'd want the code correctly identified as well.
>
> I'm not asking that I be given credit for something I didn't do. Nor am I
> attempting to diminish in any way the size,quantity, or quality, of
> Jiri's contribution. I am simply requesting that it be properly
> identified as a derivation of code I wrote.
>
> It's imperative that the lineage of code be correctly identified (in fact,
> if GDB had a legal team, it's the first thing they'd do). In most cases,
> you can determine it from the cvs annotate/the changelogs. However, for
> new contributions, there is no history. Since I never sent the code
> in question to gdb-patches, it also has no record there.
>
> I only care because I've been getting an increasing number of requests
> from companies wanting to buy the source code to the C++ debugger I wrote
> to replace GDB ( Of course, it uses a variant of the code in question to
> read/execute frame ops). I blanket refuse such requests in the hopes that
> they'll take the money and pay for GDB work instead, but it's something
> i'd consider if times ever got really tough. If there is one thing
> having three rabbits (rabbits can't learn through negative reinforcement.
> i.e. reprimanding them after they have done something wrong does no good)
> as pets has taught me, it's that it's much easier to make sure a situation
> never happens, than it is to try to do something about it when it
> occurs.
>
> It's not just me, either. If Jiri/SuSE wanted to license the code to
> someone, he/they might accidently sign something saying he was the sole
> author, which could make him/them liable, etc.
>
> In short, i'm simply trying to eliminate something that could come back to
> bite me, or others, in the ass, later.
>
> If you really want proof it's my code, I can happily provide this as well.
>
> Since I know you get bogged down in mail, i'll give you till the end of
> the month before I go bug RMS and the FSF about this.
>
> --Dan
>
>
>