This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA/mi-testsuite] XFAIL mi*-console.exp
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, Andrew Cagney <cagney at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 20:01:40 -0500
- Subject: Re: [RFA/mi-testsuite] XFAIL mi*-console.exp
- References: <20020402194252.A20826@nevyn.them.org> <3CAA4F86.7CE409C8@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 04:40:38PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> > These tests are testing for a feature that exists either nowhere or just in
> > simulators and some remote stubs: that the inferior's output goes through
> > GDB and is properly encoded by the MI layer. Since support isn't there for
> > many remote debugging stubs or for native, I think these two tests should be
> > XFAIL'd. Does that make sense, Andrew? If so, OK to commit this?
>
> There is a dejagnu variable that you can use to see
> whether this is supported... lemme see...
>
> Ah -- here you go. You want to do something like the following:
>
> if { ![gdb_skip_stdio_test "Hello message"] } then {
> do the "hello message" test...
Isn't gdb_skip_stdio_test for things where there's no way at all to see
the output? grep, grep,...
if [target_info exists gdb,noinferiorio] {
That's not quite the same thing. You can run stdio test on a native
target, and (while GDB never sees the output) DejaGNU will. I could
do this instead, though... revised patch attached.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
2002-04-02 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
* gdb.mi/mi-console.exp: Accept native console output as an
XFAIL. Don't run the test if we don't have inferior IO.
* gdb.mi/mi0-console.exp: Likewise.
Index: testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-console.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-console.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 mi-console.exp
--- mi-console.exp 2001/08/19 01:23:43 1.7
+++ mi-console.exp 2002/04/03 01:00:34
@@ -79,7 +79,8 @@ gdb_expect {
}
}
-gdb_expect {
+if {![gdb_skip_stdio_test "Hello message"]} {
+ gdb_expect {
-re "@\"H\"\r\n.*@\"e\"\r\n.*@\"l\"\r\n.*@\"l\"\r\n.*@\"o\"\r\n.*@\" \"\r\n.*@\"\\\\\\\\\"\r\n.*@\"\\\\\"\"\r\n.*@\"!\"\r\n.*@\"\\\\r\"\r\n.*@\"\\\\n\"\r\n" {
pass "Hello message"
}
@@ -92,11 +93,12 @@ gdb_expect {
# multiple event sources to channel the output back through the
# MI.
- fail "Hello message (known bug)"
+ xfail "Hello message (known limitation)"
}
timeout {
fail "Hello message (timeout)"
}
+ }
}
gdb_expect {
Index: testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-console.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-console.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.5 mi0-console.exp
--- mi0-console.exp 2001/08/19 01:23:43 1.5
+++ mi0-console.exp 2002/04/03 01:00:34
@@ -79,7 +79,8 @@ gdb_expect {
}
}
-gdb_expect {
+if {![gdb_skip_stdio_test "Hello message"]} {
+ gdb_expect {
-re "@\"H\"\r\n.*@\"e\"\r\n.*@\"l\"\r\n.*@\"l\"\r\n.*@\"o\"\r\n.*@\" \"\r\n.*@\"\\\\\\\\\"\r\n.*@\"\\\\\"\"\r\n.*@\"!\"\r\n.*@\"\\\\r\"\r\n.*@\"\\\\n\"\r\n" {
pass "Hello message"
}
@@ -92,11 +93,12 @@ gdb_expect {
# multiple event sources to channel the output back through the
# MI.
- fail "Hello message (known bug)"
+ xfail "Hello message (known limitation)"
}
timeout {
fail "Hello message (timeout)"
}
+ }
}
gdb_expect {