This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: PATCH: check for `inline' keyword
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- To: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 23:36:34 -0500
- Subject: Re: PATCH: check for `inline' keyword
- References: <20020404001137.979665EA11@zwingli.cygnus.com>
> This allows GDB to use the `inline' keyword, but still build under
> compilers that don't support it.
Um, I'm curious. On which machine? Why does GDB want to use the inline
keyword?
Andrew
> 2002-04-03 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
>
> * configure.in: Call AC_C_INLINE.
> * configure: Regenerated.
>
> Index: gdb/configure.in
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/configure.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.84
> diff -c -r1.84 configure.in
> *** gdb/configure.in 2002/03/15 00:44:49 1.84
> --- gdb/configure.in 2002/04/04 00:10:02
> ***************
> *** 130,135 ****
> --- 130,136 ----
> AC_HEADER_STAT
>
> AC_C_CONST
> + AC_C_INLINE
>
> AC_CHECK_FUNCS(bcopy btowc bzero canonicalize_file_name isascii poll \
> realpath sbrk setpgid setpgrp sigaction sigprocmask sigsetmask )
>