This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA/mi-testsuite] XFAIL mi*-console.exp


> On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 04:49:54PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> >OK, so it isn't an XFAIL.  I don't think FAIL is really appropriate
>> >either; tests which test a not-yet-implemented feature (and one that I
>> >think is a bad idea, for native targets, to be honest) don't add any
>> >information by failing.  UNSUPPORTED perhaps?  Or just not running the
>> >test in native setups, for now?
> 
>> Er, actually, XFAIL might be closer to the truth than UNSUPPORTED. 
>> Although neither indicate UNIMPLEMENTED.
> 
> 
> I'm just going to sit on this patch until we can decide what the result
> should be.  I've posted both XFAIL and UNSUPPORTED versions for your
> viewing pleasure...

Suggest a bug report so it isn't forgotten.

Andrew



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]