This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: KFAIL DejaGnu patch


> None of the ones that I'm interested in - gcc, binutils, gdb - do.  It 
>> is a shame that DejaGnu does as that is the only other tool I really 
>> depend on.
> 
> 
> Well, these tools have been around for quite a while, and already have
> reasonably complete manuals. Luckily most people rarely ever had anything
> to the DejaGnu manual, so I don't think it's a big problem. Adding a few
> paragraphs here and there is just a cut and paste job anyway, whether texinfo
> or docbook is used.
> 
>   At this point though, I have no interest in porting the manual *again* to
> switch to texinfo. Too much work, for too little gain.

That is a judgement call.  The ammount of work required by an individual 
to switch vs the advantages (and disadvantages) to the entire dejagnu 
community.

enjoy,
Andrew


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]