This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH/RFA] Fix busted logic in find_saved_register()
- From: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej at wasabisystems dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 16:26:39 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Fix busted logic in find_saved_register()
- Organization: Wasabi Systems, Inc.
- References: <20020420144817.W1627@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> <3CC1F4D3.9020104@cygnus.com>
- Reply-to: thorpej at wasabisystems dot com
On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:08:03PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Yes. Looks like my:
>
> 2002-04-17 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
>
> * frame.c (find_saved_register): Find saved registers in the next
> not prev frame.
> Fix PR gdb/365.
>
> flushed out another problem.
Ok, I will commit the fix.
> You mention that the alpha is calling that function. Is that directly
> or indirectly? I'm going to eliminate the MIPS direct call.
Directly. The alpha_get_saved_register() is nearly identical to the
mips_get_saved_register().
How are you changing the MIPS target?
--
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>