This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] fix pr reference syntax in gdb.c++/method.exp
- From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:05:04 -0700
- Subject: Re: [patch] fix pr reference syntax in gdb.c++/method.exp
- Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
- References: <200204231921.g3NJLtG25527@duracef.shout.net>
Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
>
> Hmmm. Sometimes, like this time, I post patches to testsuite/gdb.c++
> that I am committing immediately. And sometimes, I post patches for
> testsuite/gdb.c++ and give people a day or two to comment before I commit.
> Right now I am marking both of these as "[patch]".
I think the custom is to mark the second type as "[RFA]".
> Michael Snyder writes:
> > If you want to avoid ambiguity, you could say "committed"
> > in your original "PATCH" message.
>
> I will do that, unless Andrew has something to say (I thought he
> liked to see explicit "committed" messages to help him mananage
> his inbox).
I think that was meant to apply to the "[RFA]" genre.