This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] fix pr reference syntax in gdb.c++/method.exp
- From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:52:41 -0700
- Subject: Re: [patch] fix pr reference syntax in gdb.c++/method.exp
- Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
- References: <200204240345.g3O3j6615086@duracef.shout.net>
Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
>
> Michael Snyder writes:
> > I think the custom is to mark the second type as "[RFA]".
>
> Okay, I'll try that. It feels a little funny because I'm not actually
> asking for approval, I'm asking for a veto (if any). That is, if no
> response comes in, then I commit such a patch.
It's just syntax, Michael. ;-)
I don't think we need to introduce a new RFV flag...