Re: [RFA] Type cleanups

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>]

On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 11:37:29AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> >>Did you check all the cross targets build per MAINTAINERS?  From memory 
> >>sh-hms[bfd] and avr[need to look] don't build at present (well as of 
> >>~2002-05-12-gmt).
> >>
> >>If that has been checked, then yes ``obviously''.
> >
> >
> >A few don't build; none of them are my fault.  For the record:
> >
> >	At least fr30-elf, mn10300-elf, and v850-elf have missing
> >dependencies off in sim/ land; they built with non-parallel make only.
> 
> >	hppa1.1-hp-proelf wants dl.h and machine/save_state.h in
> >hppa-tdep.c, and was already marked broken.  The nice gawk segment
> >doesn't notice that...
> 
> HP/UX isn't on the list.  I get:
> 
> hppa1.1-hp-proelf broken
> 
> The note should probably mention that you normally want to stip out 
> broken targets.
> 
> >	Several targets (i586-pc-msdosdjgpp, sparc-elf, sparc64-elf)
> >	failed with this message (also JB_SP for Sparc):
> >
> >In file included from /usr/include/setjmp.h:30,
> >                 from ../../src-build/gdb/top.c:58:
> >/usr/include/bits/setjmp.h:31: warning: `JB_PC' redefined
> >tm.h:57: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
> >make[1]: *** [top.o] Error 1
> 
> I don't get that on the three systems I use.  Bug in the system library?

Hmm, I'm not sure where the necessary preprocessor definitions are
coming from to make that definition visible.  I'll look in to it.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer