This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch/rfc] h8300 Change literal reg numbers to REGNUM macros
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
- Cc: Andrew Volkov <Andrew dot Volkov at transas dot com>,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 14:48:53 +0200
- Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] h8300 Change literal reg numbers to REGNUM macros
- References: <200205151239.NAA14345@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> writes:
|> > Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> writes:
|> >
|> > |> ! return time (0); //WinXX HAS UNIX like 'time', so why not using it?
|> > |>
|> > |> C++ style comments are not legal ANSI C.
|> >
|> > Hmm, which ANSI C do you mean? C++ style comments are surely valid in
|> > ANSI C as we know it today.
|> >
|> > Andreas.
|> >
|>
|> c89, the original (which, to the best of my knowledge is the standard GDB
|> is coded to). C++ style comments didn't become legal in C until c99.
I know, but you should say that explicitly. Your original statement is
not correct in this form.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."