Re: try_catch.cc -> try-catch.cc

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>]

> I actually thought about that.  :)  I believe this section applies:
> 
>   http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/onlinedocs/gdbint_16.html#SEC157
>   The source language programs do @emph{not} need to be in a consistent
>   style.  Since @value{GDBN} is used to debug programs written in many different
>   styles, it's worth having a mix of styles in the testsuite; for
>   instance, some @value{GDBN} bugs involving the display of source lines would
>   never manifest themselves if the programs used GNU coding style
>   uniformly.
> 
> I know it's unlikely that gdb will ever have a bug where it can't
> handle '_' in a filename.  (Although gdb does have filename completion).
> It's more the principle of keeping the test suite programs diverse
> and uncanonicalized.

(GDB will have bugs where it thinks try-catch.cc is `try - catch.cc' :-)

> I'll change it if you want it changed, though.

I see your point.  I think here the question is more one of keeping the 
test focused on exercising a specific feature - try/catch - rather than 
a coding style issue.

Anyway, your call. (Hmm, we desperatly need some file name completer 
tests including some containing spaces.)

enjoy,
Andrew