This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] block_innermost_frame tweak


> Is there a better name?  As you note, it isn't a valid PC (it may not 
> even point into an instruction!).  Further, it is isn't the address of 
> the instruction ``calling'' the ``frame''.  Last time this came up 
> address_in_block() was used - frame_address_in_block()?

I have no problem renaming it to frame_address_in_block, provided we all
agree on the name.

> Just BTW frame_in_dummy() isn't an indication of an innermost frame. 
> There can easily be other frames (and even dummy frames) more inner most 
> than that dummy frame.

Right. I noticed this when I reworked my changes, but thanks.

-- 
Joel


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]