This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: don't read coff line number unless we have symbols too


Jim Blandy wrote :
> 
> Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com> writes:
> > Hello,
> > > Seems OK to me.
> > 
> > This change seems to be causing some problems. Unfortunately, I don't
> > have all the details yet. Can we put this patch on hold until I collect
> > all the information, please?
> 
> Sure.
> 
> It's supposed to be semantically undetectable, except for not reading
> the line number info.  The code simply makes GDB not read info from
> the executable that it will never use.  If that expectation is
> incorrect, I definitely want to know.
>  
> 
Should the following lines not be kept outside of the conditional block ?

       info->min_lineno_offset = 0;
       info->max_lineno_offset = 0;


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]