This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [5.2.1] quiet warnings for gdbreplay.c


On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 12:12:31PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >+#ifdef HAVE_STRING_H
> >+#include <string.h>
> >+#endif
> 
> Should that bit be "gdb_string.h"?

That depends :)  gdbreplay is not part of GDB and has a different
config.h header (tests for a different set of macros).  I had
eliminated all references to the gdb source code but then I introduced
an include of "gdb_proc_service.h", since the alternative was just
duplicating it; I have the feeling we should move that and headers like
gdb_string.h somewhere common - are they include/gdb/ candidates?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]