This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Resend: [RFA] Fix problem with i386 watchpoints after restarting
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Pierre Muller <muller at ics dot u-strasbg dot fr>
- Cc: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at chello dot nl>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 12:25:44 -0400
- Subject: Re: Resend: [RFA] Fix problem with i386 watchpoints after restarting
- References: <200206131016.g5DAGcf00647@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <4.2.0.58.20020613091046.01957c70@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <4.2.0.58.20020613091046.01957c70@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <4.2.0.58.20020704143015.02832028@ics.u-strasbg.fr>
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 03:12:46PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote:
> At 15:35 17/06/2002 , Pierre Muller a écrit:
> >At 12:16 13/06/2002 , Mark Kettenis a écrit:
> > >Sorry, I somehow missed your earlier message. This seems to me as an
> > >acceptable way to solve the problem (although I still think there is
> > >something wrong with GDB's mechanism of removing hardware breakpoints.
> > >But: could you add the reason why this is needed to the comment.
> > >Minor nit: Please end your sentences with a '.' and put two spaces
> > >after it.
> >OK, I slightly modifed the patch
> >by adding a comment to i386-nat.c
> >and correcting the comment in the nm-i386.h file.
> >
> >Can I check this in?
>
> After getting approval by a private mail, I have
> checked this in.
Is this appropriate for the branch also? My instincts say yes.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer