At 18:25 04/07/2002 , Daniel Jacobowitz a écrit:
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 03:12:46PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote:
> At 15:35 17/06/2002 , Pierre Muller a écrit:
> >At 12:16 13/06/2002 , Mark Kettenis a écrit:
> > >Sorry, I somehow missed your earlier message. This seems to me as an
> > >acceptable way to solve the problem (although I still think there is
> > >something wrong with GDB's mechanism of removing hardware breakpoints.
> > >But: could you add the reason why this is needed to the comment.
> > >Minor nit: Please end your sentences with a '.' and put two spaces
> > >after it.
> >OK, I slightly modifed the patch
> >by adding a comment to i386-nat.c
> >and correcting the comment in the nm-i386.h file.
> >
> >Can I check this in?
>
> After getting approval by a private mail, I have
> checked this in.
Is this appropriate for the branch also? My instincts say yes.
Isn't 5.2.1 aleady frozen?