This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [TESTSUITE] assert (char == signed char)


Neil Booth wrote:

Michael Snyder wrote:-


> There seem to be some tests in the testsuite that are
> based on the assumption that chars are signed, and that
> will fail if they are unsigned.
That isn't correct.

> Eg:
> sizeof.exp: check valueof ((int) (char)) -1 == -1
> (prints 255 if char == unsigned)
sizeof.exp's purpose in life is to check that GDB and the running program agree about the funamental points of life (such as the sizeof an int or the signof char).

> pointers.exp: ptype pC
> (outputs "unsigned char *" if char == unsigned)
>
> Any thoughts?  Should these be regularized to accept unsigned?
> Should it be based on a configure variable?

I'd pass -fsigned-char; that's done in some other tests.
That would be silly :-) The failure strongly suggests that something is skewiff.

To gcc?  Problem is, what if it isn't gcc?  As eg. Irix cc?
Michael, I think you might have a GDB bug.

Andrew



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]