This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFC: ``detach remote''
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at ges dot redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 17:40:59 -0400
- Subject: Re: RFC: ``detach remote''
- References: <20020811030130.GA10208@nevyn.them.org> <3D567F7B.7080502@ges.redhat.com> <20020811163515.GA14609@nevyn.them.org> <3D56A6A1.7040904@ges.redhat.com> <20020811183448.GA19112@nevyn.them.org> <20020811205238.GA23632@nevyn.them.org> <3D57C800.4010809@ges.redhat.com> <20020812144726.GA25234@nevyn.them.org> <20020829215405.GA24354@nevyn.them.org> <3D752A86.5080508@ges.redhat.com>
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 05:32:54PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >2002-08-29 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
> >
> > * mi-cmds.c (mi_cmds): Add ``-target-disconnect''.
> > * gdbmi.texinfo: Document ``-target-disconnect''.
>
> For MI, it needs a test case. It might as well accept both ``command
> not for this target'' and ``success'. I think people often first write
> the test case and then use the trace output to finish the doco.
OK. I haven't looked at that part of the MI testsuite so I'll have to
come back to this when I have a little time.
> >2002-08-29 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
> >
> > * gdb.texinfo: Document ``disconnect'' command.
>
> (under which node? C-X 4 a normally includes that).
I don't use emacs to write ChangeLog entries, I find changelog-mode too
unintuitive.
> Eli will likely have more pointers. I think at least a ``@kindex
> disconnect'' entry.
>
> (I think hold this one for 5.3, at least for the moment),
OK; I'd like to see it in 5.3 but if you think it's too new then it can
wait. Sounds like you're OK with the command syntax, which is what I
really wanted to establish.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer