This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA/MI testsuite] mi_run_to_main/mi_next/mi_step
- From: Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>
- To: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 07:28:18 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: [RFA/MI testsuite] mi_run_to_main/mi_next/mi_step
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Elena Zannoni wrote:
> Hmmm how does this interact with the mi_next_to, etc, functions that
> were added back in November?
> the original patch was here:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-10/msg00336.html
The two pathways are completely independent, although they appear to
accomplish the same thing. The stop specification for mi_step/next_to is
more stringent, though.
This patch just fixes what is already in mi-support.exp, which doesn't
work at all. As an alternative, we could whack mi_step and mi_next (or I
we could even re-write those to use mi_step_to and mi_next_to, come to
think of it).
Keith