This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA/MI testsuite] mi_run_to_main/mi_next/mi_step


On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Elena Zannoni wrote:

> Hmmm how does this interact with the mi_next_to, etc, functions that
> were added back in November?
> the original patch was here:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-10/msg00336.html

The two pathways are completely independent, although they appear to 
accomplish the same thing. The stop specification for mi_step/next_to is 
more stringent, though.

This patch just fixes what is already in mi-support.exp, which doesn't 
work at all. As an alternative, we could whack mi_step and mi_next (or I 
we could even re-write those to use mi_step_to and mi_next_to, come to 
think of it).

Keith



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]