This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA/MI testsuite] Add mi_runto
Keith Seitz writes:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Elena Zannoni wrote:
>
> > Yes, please. Thanks. It will be easier to maintain if we have only one
> > copy of these functions.
>
> UGH. Now I remember why I did this... mi_run_to_helper expects an MI
> command to execute, either "exec-continue" or "exec-run". There is no way
> for us to know this if we are attempting to run the inferior for the first
> time (or re-run it). This is usually handled by mi_run_cmd, and that is
> the difference between these to functions. They are essentially the same,
> otherwise. The best I can do is put the mi_gdb_test for the stop in
> anohter proc, but I think that would just mess the code up even more.
> (mi_step and mi_next are okay, though).
>
> Of course, it's your call.
> Keith
>
Oh ok. mi_run_to executes an inferior that has already started.
While mi_runto starts it from scratch.
Could we rename mi_run_to to something like mi_execute_to instead?
It is used only in mi-var-cmd.exp.
And add your paragraph above in mi-support.exp as a comment?
Elena