This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[RFA] testsuite/gdb.base/commands.exp: Don't expect "Program exited normally" string


Hi,

the command.exp test expects the string "Program exited normally" when
testing commands execution on breakpoints.  This might fail on some
remote targets and simulators which never reaches a normal exit but
stop execution at some defined trap in _exit() or friend.

For that reason I'd propose to drop the above expectation from the test.

Corinna

	* gdb.base/commands.exp: Don't expect a "Program exited normally"
	string after running the commands execution on breakpoint tests.

Index: gdb.base/commands.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/commands.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.11 commands.exp
--- gdb.base/commands.exp	27 Aug 2002 01:09:09 -0000	1.11
+++ gdb.base/commands.exp	13 Sep 2002 14:45:28 -0000
@@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ proc bp_deleted_in_command_test {} {
 
     gdb_run_cmd
     gdb_expect {
-        -re ".*factorial command-list executed.*1.*Program exited normally.*$gdb_prompt $" {
+        -re ".*factorial command-list executed.*1.*$gdb_prompt $" {
 	    pass "run factorial until breakpoint"
         }
 	-re ".*$gdb_prompt $" {
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ proc temporary_breakpoint_commands {} {
 
     gdb_run_cmd
     gdb_expect {
-	-re ".*factorial tbreak commands executed.*1.*Program exited normally.*" {
+	-re ".*factorial tbreak commands executed.*1.*$gdb_prompt $" {
 	    pass "run factorial until temporary breakpoint"
 	}
 	timeout { fail "(timeout) run factorial until temporary breakpoint" }

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Developer
Red Hat, Inc.
mailto:vinschen@redhat.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]