This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

[rfa/testsuite] rename m-static1.cc to m-stat1.cc

From: David Carlton <carlton at math dot stanford dot edu>
To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Cc: Fernando Nasser <fnasser at redhat dot com>
Date: 20 Sep 2002 08:46:54 -0700
Subject: [rfa/testsuite] rename m-static1.cc to m-stat1.cc

Andrew just pointed out to me that the presence of both m-static.cc
and m-static1.cc (in gdb.c++) violates the 8.3 rule.  Is it okay if I
rename m-static1.cc to m-stat1.cc?  (And make the corresponding
obvious change to m-static.exp, of course.)  Or is there some other
name I should use?

David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [rfa/testsuite] rename m-static1.cc to m-stat1.cc
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]