This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfa/testsuite] rename m-static1.cc to m-stat1.cc
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: David Carlton <carlton at math dot stanford dot edu>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, Fernando Nasser <fnasser at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:51:44 -0400
- Subject: Re: [rfa/testsuite] rename m-static1.cc to m-stat1.cc
- References: <ro1ofasvf2p.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 08:46:54AM -0700, David Carlton wrote:
> Andrew just pointed out to me that the presence of both m-static.cc
> and m-static1.cc (in gdb.c++) violates the 8.3 rule. Is it okay if I
> rename m-static1.cc to m-stat1.cc? (And make the corresponding
> obvious change to m-static.exp, of course.) Or is there some other
> name I should use?
I'd rather you just add them to the list; it's in
gdb/config/djgpp/fnchange.lst. Others may have a different opinion,
though..
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer