This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [Bug-dejagnu] Dejagnu and parallel make tests of gcc
- From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser at redhat dot com>
- To: Rob Savoye <rob at welcomehome dot org>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com,bug-dejagnu at gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:49:20 -0400
- Subject: Re: [Bug-dejagnu] Dejagnu and parallel make tests of gcc
- Organization: Red Hat , Inc. - Toronto
- References: <200209241614.g8OGE2030397@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <20020924104439.C8038@welcomehome.org>
Rob Savoye wrote:> On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 05:14:02PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
Ok, first question. Is the copy of dejagnu on sources.redhat.com (the one
in gdb) the master copy these days, or is there some other mailing list
for dejagnu framework patches?
The official sources are on Savannah. www.gnu.org/software/dejagnu should
get you there. I do believe sources.redhat.com has recently been synced up
with the master repository at the FSF. But these two repositories are usually
reasonably close to each other.
Yes, except for one baseboard file and configuration they are the same
(some blank lines and space differences which I will get rid of after Rob
finishes with the dejagnu release).
The second patch is to the dejagnu framework itself and ensures that when
we transfer the object to the (potentially remote) host we use a filename
that will not conflict with any other -- in this case I've chosen
${tool}_tg.o, which should be fairly safe.
Looks safe to me. I'll check it in after the DejaGnu 1.4.3 release
happens over the next day or so. (I hope) I'm just trying to get my
release files uploaded to the FSF still... then it's done.
It is OK with me as well. Please check it in sources.redhat.com
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9