This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [rfc/rfa:doco] Use @sc{gdb}?


On Sep 26,  1:40pm, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> >> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 18:33:51 -0400
> >> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
> >> 
> >> I got annoyed at all the GDB's in the formatted manual being really 
> >> large so tried changing them to @sc{gdb}.  It fixed that problem but I'm 
> >> not sure that I like the final result :-)  (You'll need to build 
> >> gdb.pdf, gdb ps or gdb.dvi).
> >> 
> >> Is there a style guide thing on this one?  Eli?
> > 
> > 
> > There are no strict rules on this one, AFAIK.  If the results of
> > @sc{gdb} look nice to people, let's do it; if not, let's not.
> > 
> > Personally, I like the results of @sc in such cases.
> 
> So, decision time.  Trunk and 5.3 branch?

Having just been through this with GNU vs @sc{gnu}, I think it makes
sense to do it for GDB.

Andrew, what bothered you about the result?  (You said that you weren't
sure that you liked the final result.)

Kevin


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]