On Sep 26, 1:40pm, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 18:33:51 -0400
>> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
>>
>> I got annoyed at all the GDB's in the formatted manual being really
>> large so tried changing them to @sc{gdb}. It fixed that problem but I'm
>> not sure that I like the final result :-) (You'll need to build
>> gdb.pdf, gdb ps or gdb.dvi).
>>
>> Is there a style guide thing on this one? Eli?
>
>
> There are no strict rules on this one, AFAIK. If the results of
> @sc{gdb} look nice to people, let's do it; if not, let's not.
>
> Personally, I like the results of @sc in such cases.
So, decision time. Trunk and 5.3 branch?
Having just been through this with GNU vs @sc{gnu}, I think it makes
sense to do it for GDB.
Andrew, what bothered you about the result? (You said that you weren't
sure that you liked the final result.)