This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
It's a bit late for that. Someone should audit the changes made so far and identify which caused syntax changes and update accordingly. Fixes could, perhaphs be pushed into 5.3 (but I don't have the time).> >Are you planning to revert mi1 then?Que?"mi2" changes have been sneaking in. Are you planning to revert them - create an "mi1" which matches what mi1 actually was.
I think a line is drawn when each release is made. I'd expect an MI client to explicitly specify -i=miN (where N was formally released) rather than trust -i=mi.Otherwise, where is the line drawn to mark the interface version as final? It seems to me that the default shouldn't be evolving, that -i=mi should default to a fixed point until the next version is running.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |