I've seen bug reports for HP/UX, but never for any of the others; and
we know the HPPA target has broken periodically, so that's a good hint
that no one's tracking them. Of course if it's not much trouble, we
can keep them for now and deal with it later - but I'm not sure that we
need to hang on to all of them.
Looking at GCC's supported targets, I wouldn't be surprised if
hppa-openbsd is in use, but that won't match the existing pattern
anyway... ditto hppa-rtems.
Is the list above the correct list to look at to get the list of new
OSABI enums? I would like to suggest the addition of
GDB_OSABI_HPPA
GDB_OSABI_HPPA_64
GDB_OSABI_HPPA_BSD
GDB_OSABI_HPPA_HPUX
GDB_OSABI_HPPA_OSF
GDB_OSABI_HPPA_PRO
Does this look ok?
I don't think they're necessary, by analogy with the existing code...
certainly not GDB_OSABI_HPPA or GDB_OSABI_HPPA_64. We probably need
GDB_OSABI_HPUX. We've already got OSF1, which is presumably the right
OSF target.
Personally, I'd just, initally worry about: