Re: [rfa] store.exp failures

[Fernando Nasser <fnasser at redhat dot com>]

David Carlton wrote:> Whoops, I should have sent this to gdb-patches instead of gdb.
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 16:42:51 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> said:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 01:30:54PM -0800, David Carlton wrote:
>
> > > So, basically, it looks like some of the calls to the wack_XXX
> > > functions are getting optimized out by the compiler, even though no
> > > optimization flags are being passed.
> > Make the function non-static and it should work as expected...
>
> Good call.  Here's a patch, which cures my GCC 3.x problems (though
> the two GCC 2.95 failures remain; I have no idea if they're our fault
> or GCC's).  Is it okay to commit?
I don't think not being static affects the goal of test at all, so if it fixes 
the problem I have no objection.

Fernando


> David Carlton
> carlton@math.stanford.edu
>
> 2002-12-05  David Carlton  <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
>
> 	* gdb.base/store.c: Don't declare functions static.
>
> Index: store.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/store.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.1
> diff -u -p -r1.1 store.c
> --- store.c	5 Dec 2002 01:48:19 -0000	1.1
> +++ store.c	5 Dec 2002 21:48:24 -0000
> @@ -2,37 +2,42 @@
>     in the target.  This pretty much relies on the compiler taking heed
>     of requests for values to be stored in registers.  */
>  
> -static char
> +/* NOTE: carlton/2002-12-05: These functions were all static, but for
> +   whatever reason that caused GCC 3.1 to optimize away some of the
> +   function calls within main even when no optimization flags were
> +   passed.  */
> +
> +char
>  add_char (register char u, register char v)
>  {
>    return u + v;
>  }
>  
> -static short
> +short
>  add_short (register short u, register short v)
>  {
>    return u + v;
>  }
>  
> -static int
> +int
>  add_int (register int u, register int v)
>  {
>    return u + v;
>  }
>  
> -static long
> +long
>  add_long (register long u, register long v)
>  {
>    return u + v;
>  }
>  
> -static float
> +float
>  add_float (register float u, register float v)
>  {
>    return u + v;
>  }
>  
> -static double
> +double
>  add_double (register double u, register double v)
>  {
>    return u + v;
> @@ -40,7 +45,7 @@ add_double (register double u, register 
>  
>  /* */
>  
> -static char
> +char
>  wack_char (register char u, register char v)
>  {
>    register char l = u;
> @@ -48,7 +53,7 @@ wack_char (register char u, register cha
>    return l;
>  }
>  
> -static short
> +short
>  wack_short (register short u, register short v)
>  {
>    register short l = u;
> @@ -56,7 +61,7 @@ wack_short (register short u, register s
>    return l;
>  }
>  
> -static int
> +int
>  wack_int (register int u, register int v)
>  {
>    register int l = u;
> @@ -64,7 +69,7 @@ wack_int (register int u, register int v
>    return l;
>  }
>  
> -static long
> +long
>  wack_long (register long u, register long v)
>  {
>    register long l = u;
> @@ -72,7 +77,7 @@ wack_long (register long u, register lon
>    return l;
>  }
>  
> -static float
> +float
>  wack_float (register float u, register float v)
>  {
>    register float l = u;
> @@ -80,7 +85,7 @@ wack_float (register float u, register f
>    return l;
>  }
>  
> -static double
> +double
>  wack_double (register double u, register double v)
>  {
>    register double l = u;
> @@ -93,7 +98,7 @@ struct s_2 { short s[2]; } z_2, s_2;
>  struct s_3 { short s[3]; } z_3, s_3;
>  struct s_4 { short s[4]; } z_4, s_4;
>  
> -static struct s_1
> +struct s_1
>  add_struct_1 (struct s_1 s)
>  {
>    int i;
> @@ -104,7 +109,7 @@ add_struct_1 (struct s_1 s)
>    return s;
>  }
>  
> -static struct s_2
> +struct s_2
>  add_struct_2 (struct s_2 s)
>  {
>    int i;
> @@ -115,7 +120,7 @@ add_struct_2 (struct s_2 s)
>    return s;
>  }
>  
> -static struct s_3
> +struct s_3
>  add_struct_3 (struct s_3 s)
>  {
>    int i;
> @@ -126,7 +131,7 @@ add_struct_3 (struct s_3 s)
>    return s;
>  }
>  
> -static struct s_4
> +struct s_4
>  add_struct_4 (struct s_4 s)
>  {
>    int i;
> @@ -137,7 +142,7 @@ add_struct_4 (struct s_4 s)
>    return s;
>  }
>  
> -static struct s_1
> +struct s_1
>  wack_struct_1 (void)
>  {
>    int i; register struct s_1 u = z_1;
> @@ -146,7 +151,7 @@ wack_struct_1 (void)
>    return u;
>  }
>  
> -static struct s_2
> +struct s_2
>  wack_struct_2 (void)
>  {
>    int i; register struct s_2 u = z_2;
> @@ -155,7 +160,7 @@ wack_struct_2 (void)
>    return u;
>  }
>  
> -static struct s_3
> +struct s_3
>  wack_struct_3 (void)
>  {
>    int i; register struct s_3 u = z_3;
> @@ -164,7 +169,7 @@ wack_struct_3 (void)
>    return u;
>  }
>  
> -static struct s_4
> +struct s_4
>  wack_struct_4 (void)
>  {
>    int i; register struct s_4 u = z_4;
> @@ -180,28 +185,28 @@ struct f_2 {unsigned i:2;unsigned j:2;un
>  struct f_3 {unsigned i:3;unsigned j:3;unsigned k:3; } f_3 = {1,1,1}, F_3;
>  struct f_4 {unsigned i:4;unsigned j:4;unsigned k:4; } f_4 = {1,1,1}, F_4;
>  
> -static struct f_1
> +struct f_1
>  wack_field_1 (void)
>  {
>    register struct f_1 u = f_1;
>    return u;
>  }
>  
> -static struct f_2
> +struct f_2
>  wack_field_2 (void)
>  {
>    register struct f_2 u = f_2;
>    return u;
>  }
>  
> -static struct f_3
> +struct f_3
>  wack_field_3 (void)
>  {
>    register struct f_3 u = f_3;
>    return u;
>  }
>  
> -static struct f_4
> +struct f_4
>  wack_field_4 (void)
>  {
>    register struct f_4 u = f_4;


--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto                       E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9