This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: re-re-re-re-configuring
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>
- Cc: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, gcc-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 22:24:04 -0500
- Subject: Re: re-re-re-re-configuring
- References: <20021206102555.GA15028@redhat.com> <200212061850.gB6Io3m26371@greed.delorie.com> <3DF3C9D7.90204@twcny.rr.com>
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 05:38:15PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> And the reason I didn't do this was due to a different bug.
> If libiberty is changed, then since
> configure-bfd: configure-libiberty
> configure-bfd: bfd/Makefile
>
> bfd/Makefile won't be regenerated.
>
> The correct solution is to change it to
> bfd/Makefile: libiberty/Makefile
>
> which I will work up a simple patch for if nobody beats me to it.
>
> (I'll replace all maybe-configure-X: configure-X dependencies with
> maybe-configure-X: X/Makefile dependencies.)
So, um, silly question. Why does changing libiberty require that
bfd/Makefile be regenerated?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer