This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfa/breakpoint] Use a frame ID instead of a frame
- From: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 11 Dec 2002 16:04:31 -0500
- Subject: Re: [rfa/breakpoint] Use a frame ID instead of a frame
- References: <3DED6E73.4050807@redhat.com> <3DF6589B.7060902@redhat.com>
Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> writes:
> Ok to commit?
Yes, it looks good to me.
I can't try it out, since it doesn't apply any more (I guess that's
what happens if you take too long to review something), but it seems
to me that it should have no effect on the behavior of the code at
all, since frame_id_eq actually ignores the PCs of the frame_ids it's
passed, so frame_id's behave just like the frame base addresses the
code used before. Is that right?