I want to think about this a little more anyway; as Michael mentioned,
I don't think it's recursion safe. I can't fix this syntax due to TCL
limitations, so it might become:
gdb_test_multiple "break Foo::Bar" "breakpoint on Foo::Bar" \
"Breakpoint at .*\[\r\n\]$gdb_prompt $" { pass $msg } \
"Bang." { kfail "gdb/90211" $msg }
Which isn't so bad, after all. I had some reason not to do it that way
but I can't remember what it was, now. What do you think of this
change?
Which ever. My concern is with `$_gdb_message'. Knowing how to use
that would have required a deep understanding of what the function
gdb_test_multiple{} was doing. The above at least makes immediate sense
to someone with little tcl/tk knowledge (read: average gdb developer :-).