This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
That is correct. The last argument of a setup_xfail, if it does not contain '-' (Argh! Don't blame me, it was already there since immemorial times) is the PR number. It can easily be a gdb/NNN bug id. We cannot enforce the syntax, but we can enforce it as a police.
There is suspended and closed. I'm pretty sure I can add other states (e.g., cannotfix?).So, to address Michael's concerns, we could open a WONTFIX bug report (is there such category? This is the Bugzilla one) saying that it is a GCC or whatever bug and outside of our control and add the id to the setup_xfail.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |