This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] KFAIL gdb/1025

From: David Carlton <carlton at math dot stanford dot edu>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
Date: 04 Feb 2003 14:28:35 -0800
Subject: Re: [patch] KFAIL gdb/1025
References: <ro1isw06dye.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU><20030204144415.GA30443@nevyn.them.org><ro13cn455km.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>

On 04 Feb 2003 09:16:57 -0800, David Carlton <carlton@math.Stanford.EDU> said:

> Anyways, I'll upgrade my binutils when I have some free time (probably
> this afternoon) and see how that affects matters.

Okay, I've upgraded binutils to 2.13.2.1; these failures go away,
along with failures on several other tests.  (Though the down side is
that I can't compile all the programs in gdb.java now; a pity, but
I'll survive.)

But I do see the failures that Michael reports with GCC 2.95.3
combined with DWARF 2.  (In other words, failures on the tests that
are smaller than ints, though not the double failure that I had been
seeing with the old binutils.)  So I'm leaving the PR open for now; if
we ever figure out what's up with that, we can close the PR and/or
XFAIL the tests, as appropriate.

David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] KFAIL gdb/1025
  - From: David Carlton

References:
- [patch] KFAIL gdb/1025
  - From: David Carlton
- Re: [patch] KFAIL gdb/1025
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [patch] KFAIL gdb/1025
  - From: David Carlton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]