This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 09:58:44PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > Well the texinfo. I read the reference as a reference to something > completly separate. > > Can you please expand the paragraph to reference: Protocol specific > representation of datatypes. Uhm... sorry but is it possible that you didn't read the texinfo file created by my patch send the week before but instead the one from December? I just looked through the doc and I was a bit surprised to see that there isn't any reference to B.1 but instead there's already a "(see @ref{Integral datatypes}, for details)" in it. I've attached the new version of my patch with the following changes: - Using M packets for memory transfer is redefined so that the target should expect M or X packets. The current implementation (my patch) uses only X packets so far. I forgot that in the original document. - The "Integral datatypes" chapter contains a hint that these datatypes are passed as big endian when part of a memory transfer of a compound type. - The "Integral datatypes" chapter defines time_t as seconds since Epoch. - A new "File-I/O Examples" chapter. Please review if that's ok now, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Developer Red Hat, Inc. mailto:vinschen at redhat dot com
Attachment:
fileio-doc-3.patch
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |