This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] disassembly fixes


Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
 > On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 09:31:08AM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote:
 > > Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
 > >  > On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 06:04:48PM -0500, Elena Zannoni wrote:
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > A few fixes for the new disassembler. I'll commit in a day or so.
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > 2003-04-04  Elena Zannoni  <ezannoni at redhat dot com>
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > 	* disasm.c (dump_insns):  Move variables inside loop, or they will
 > >  > >         be freed more than once, causing wild memory corruptions.
 > >  > > 	(gdb_disassembly): Look for the substring "-thread",
 > >  > >         instead of "-threads" in the target name, to make sure to find
 > >  > >         the 'multi-thread' target.  Also, make sure we do the right thing 
 > >  > >         with the "core" target.
 > >  > 
 > >  > While you're in there, any comments on:
 > >  >   http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2003-02/msg00153.html
 > >  > ?
 > >  > 
 > > 
 > > Hmm, yes, I think that logic is a bit screwed up (it came from gdbtk,
 > > and maybe there it was more appropriate), I have no objections if you
 > > want to revisit the heuristics.  n hte meantime I would apply these
 > > changes anyway because disassembly with core files and threaded
 > > programs just doesn't work at all.
 > 
 > Sounds good to me!

ok, applied.

elena


 > 
 > -- 
 > Daniel Jacobowitz
 > MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]