Re: [RFA] handling of 'operator' in cp_find_first_component

[David Carlton <carlton at math dot stanford dot edu>]

On 23 Apr 2003 16:02:06 -0700, David Carlton <carlton at math dot stanford dot edu> said:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 23:21:52 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com> said:

>> That said, I still think your patch is OK; on the condition that it
>> handles the test case the comment you're removing refers to.  Something
>> like:
>> int foo<operator() (B&)>
>> or whatever it was in the right syntax.  Does it, and can you add that
>> to the maint.exp tests?

> It should handle them, but you're right, I should include such
> examples in the maint.exp tests.  I'll go off and generate some
> examples first before checking it in.

I've checked it in with more examples, as you requested.  I can get
the demangler to produce this:

  jackfruit$ c++filt _Z3fooIXadL_Zls1CS0_EEEiv
  int foo<&(operator<<(C, C))>()

Just to be on the safe side, I added variants of that without the
extra parens and even without the &, but with a comment that I'd only
seen the first one in the wild.  I'm including the new maint.exp patch
below; I didn't change the cp-support.c patch.

David Carlton
carlton at math dot stanford dot edu

2003-04-23  David Carlton  <carlton at bactrian dot org>

	* gdb.c++/maint.exp (test_first_component): Add tests for
	'operator' in more locations.

Index: maint.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/maint.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1 maint.exp
--- maint.exp   15 Apr 2003 23:07:11 -0000      1.1
+++ maint.exp   23 Apr 2003 23:43:31 -0000
@@ -63,6 +63,18 @@ proc test_first_component {} {
     test_single_component "foo(std::basic_streambuf<wchar_t,std::char_traits<wchar_t> >)"
     test_single_component "operator>(X::Y)"

+    # Operator names can show up in weird places.
+
+    test_single_component "int operator<< <char>()"
+    test_single_component "T<Cooperator>"
+
+    # NOTE: carlton/2003-04-23: I've only seen the first of these
+    # produced by the demangler, but I'm including two more just to be
+    # on the safe side.
+    test_single_component "int foo<&(operator<<(C, C))>()"
+    test_single_component "int foo<&operator<<(C, C)>()"
+    test_single_component "int foo<operator<<(C, C)>()"
+
     gdb_test "maint cp first_component foo::bar" "foo"
     gdb_test "maint cp first_component foo::bar::baz" "foo"
     gdb_test "maint cp first_component C<A>::bar" "C<A>"