This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] varobj: call CHECK_TYPEDEF

From: Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>
To: "gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com" <gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: 24 Apr 2003 14:53:53 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFA] varobj: call CHECK_TYPEDEF
Organization:
References: <1051215397.1538.43.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com> <20030424201853.GA5398@nevyn.them.org> <1051217215.1538.62.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com> <20030424204748.GA5955@nevyn.them.org>

On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 13:47, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> The important question is whether get_type is ever used to display the
> object's type; in which case we should say Bar, not "struct foo".

Yes, I think this is already a buglet in varobj. Now that I understand
the whole CHECK_TYPEDEF thing, I'll file a bug report for it.

Keith

References:
- [RFA] varobj: call CHECK_TYPEDEF
  - From: Keith Seitz
- Re: [RFA] varobj: call CHECK_TYPEDEF
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [RFA] varobj: call CHECK_TYPEDEF
  - From: Keith Seitz
- Re: [RFA] varobj: call CHECK_TYPEDEF
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]