Re: [RFA] varobj: call CHECK_TYPEDEF

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>]

On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 03:29:36PM -0700, Keith Seitz wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 15:18, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > BTW, does ...
> > 
> > struct t
> > {
> >    int a;
> >    int b;
> > };
> > 
> > typedef struct t T;
> > 
> > main()
> > {
> >    static T v = {...};
> > }
> > 
> > tickle it?
> 
> Nope, that works properly (except for it being reported as "struct t"
> instead of "T").

[Keith, you had "test for insight/792" in your posted testsuite patch.]

There's at least one compiler bug in this area, where DWARF-2 debug info
will say struct t instead of T.  I fixed it for 3.3 and (I think?)
3.2.3.  Just in case you start getting confused :)

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer