This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [WIP/RFC] MIPS registers overhaul
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 16:40:42 -0400
- Subject: Re: [WIP/RFC] MIPS registers overhaul
- References: <1030510002453.ZM3880@localhost.localdomain> <3EBD6131.30209@redhat.com>
On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 04:29:37PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >Problem 1 was solved by introducing a union type for floating point
> >registers. When attempting to display a value using ``print'', you'll
> >see (with my patch) something like this:
> >
> > (gdb) p $f20
> > $1 = {i = 4621199872640208077, f = -107374184, d = 8.9000000000000004}
> >
> >(If someone can think of more meaningful, but still terse field names for
> >the above, please let me know.)
>
> I'd try to be consistent with the other register unions, uint64 for
> instance. As for the d/f, I don't know.
How about u64, flt, and dbl?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer