This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
[patch rfc] s/extract_address/extract_unsigned_integer/ for solib
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 15:01:09 -0400
- Subject: [patch rfc] s/extract_address/extract_unsigned_integer/ for solib
Hello,
This does the s/extract_address/extract_unsigned_integer/ change to the
solib files.
One bit bugs me - IRIX. It's doing an unsigned extract when MIPS is
ment to always sign extend an address. It's very tempting to instead
make that code always do signextended extracts (I don't have access to
an IRIX 4 box though).
thoughts?
Andrew
2003-05-22 Andrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>
* solib-irix.c (extract_mips_address): Inline extract_address,
replacing it with extract_unsigned_integer.
* solib-svr4.c (SOLIB_EXTRACT_ADDRESS): Ditto.
(LM_NAME, IGNORE_FIRST_LINK_MAP_ENTRY): Ditto.
(first_link_map_member, open_symbol_file_object): Ditto.
(svr4_fetch_objfile_link_map, svr4_fetch_objfile_link_map): Ditto.
* solib-sunos.c (SOLIB_EXTRACT_ADDRESS): Ditto.
(LM_NEXT, LM_NAME): Ditto.
Index: solib-irix.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/solib-irix.c,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.3 solib-irix.c
--- solib-irix.c 8 Apr 2003 19:21:15 -0000 1.3
+++ solib-irix.c 22 May 2003 18:57:41 -0000
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
/* MIPS sign extends its 32 bit addresses. We could conceivably use
extract_typed_address here, but to do so, we'd have to construct an
appropriate type. Calling extract_signed_integer or
- extract_address seems simpler. */
+ extract_unsigned_integer seems simpler. */
static CORE_ADDR
extract_mips_address (void *addr, int len)
@@ -132,7 +132,11 @@
if (len <= 32)
return extract_signed_integer (addr, len);
else
- return extract_address (addr, len);
+ /* FIXME: cagney/2003-05-22: Is this right? MIPS addresses are
+ always signed extended right? Originally this was a call to
+ extract_address but that was just extract_unsigned_integer so
+ something weired is going on. */
+ return extract_unsigned_integer (addr, len);
}
/* Fetch and return the link map data associated with ADDR. Note that
Index: solib-sunos.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/solib-sunos.c,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.9 solib-sunos.c
--- solib-sunos.c 8 Apr 2003 19:21:15 -0000 1.9
+++ solib-sunos.c 22 May 2003 18:57:42 -0000
@@ -68,14 +68,16 @@
NULL
};
-/* Macro to extract an address from a solib structure.
- When GDB is configured for some 32-bit targets (e.g. Solaris 2.7
- sparc), BFD is configured to handle 64-bit targets, so CORE_ADDR is
- 64 bits. We have to extract only the significant bits of addresses
- to get the right address when accessing the core file BFD. */
+/* Macro to extract an address from a solib structure. When GDB is
+ configured for some 32-bit targets (e.g. Solaris 2.7 sparc), BFD is
+ configured to handle 64-bit targets, so CORE_ADDR is 64 bits. We
+ have to extract only the significant bits of addresses to get the
+ right address when accessing the core file BFD.
+
+ Assume that the address is unsigned. */
#define SOLIB_EXTRACT_ADDRESS(MEMBER) \
- extract_address (&(MEMBER), sizeof (MEMBER))
+ extract_unsigned_integer (&(MEMBER), sizeof (MEMBER))
/* local data declarations */
@@ -108,7 +110,9 @@
int lm_next_offset = offsetof (struct link_map, lm_next);
int lm_next_size = fieldsize (struct link_map, lm_next);
- return extract_address (so->lm_info->lm + lm_next_offset, lm_next_size);
+ /* Assume that the address is unsigned. */
+ return extract_unsigned_integer (so->lm_info->lm + lm_next_offset,
+ lm_next_size);
}
static CORE_ADDR
@@ -117,7 +121,9 @@
int lm_name_offset = offsetof (struct link_map, lm_name);
int lm_name_size = fieldsize (struct link_map, lm_name);
- return extract_address (so->lm_info->lm + lm_name_offset, lm_name_size);
+ /* Assume that the address is unsigned. */
+ return extract_unsigned_integer (so->lm_info->lm + lm_name_offset,
+ lm_name_size);
}
static CORE_ADDR debug_base; /* Base of dynamic linker structures */
Index: solib-svr4.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/solib-svr4.c,v
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -r1.32 solib-svr4.c
--- solib-svr4.c 15 Apr 2003 00:28:23 -0000 1.32
+++ solib-svr4.c 22 May 2003 18:57:42 -0000
@@ -105,14 +105,16 @@
NULL
};
-/* Macro to extract an address from a solib structure.
- When GDB is configured for some 32-bit targets (e.g. Solaris 2.7
- sparc), BFD is configured to handle 64-bit targets, so CORE_ADDR is
- 64 bits. We have to extract only the significant bits of addresses
- to get the right address when accessing the core file BFD. */
+/* Macro to extract an address from a solib structure. When GDB is
+ configured for some 32-bit targets (e.g. Solaris 2.7 sparc), BFD is
+ configured to handle 64-bit targets, so CORE_ADDR is 64 bits. We
+ have to extract only the significant bits of addresses to get the
+ right address when accessing the core file BFD.
+
+ Assume that the address is unsigned. */
#define SOLIB_EXTRACT_ADDRESS(MEMBER) \
- extract_address (&(MEMBER), sizeof (MEMBER))
+ extract_unsigned_integer (&(MEMBER), sizeof (MEMBER))
/* local data declarations */
@@ -132,7 +134,9 @@
{
struct link_map_offsets *lmo = SVR4_FETCH_LINK_MAP_OFFSETS ();
- return extract_address (so->lm_info->lm + lmo->l_next_offset, lmo->l_next_size);
+ /* Assume that the address is unsigned. */
+ return extract_unsigned_integer (so->lm_info->lm + lmo->l_next_offset,
+ lmo->l_next_size);
}
static CORE_ADDR
@@ -140,7 +144,9 @@
{
struct link_map_offsets *lmo = SVR4_FETCH_LINK_MAP_OFFSETS ();
- return extract_address (so->lm_info->lm + lmo->l_name_offset, lmo->l_name_size);
+ /* Assume that the address is unsigned. */
+ return extract_unsigned_integer (so->lm_info->lm + lmo->l_name_offset,
+ lmo->l_name_size);
}
static int
@@ -148,8 +154,9 @@
{
struct link_map_offsets *lmo = SVR4_FETCH_LINK_MAP_OFFSETS ();
- return extract_address (so->lm_info->lm + lmo->l_prev_offset,
- lmo->l_prev_size) == 0;
+ /* Assume that the address is unsigned. */
+ return extract_unsigned_integer (so->lm_info->lm + lmo->l_prev_offset,
+ lmo->l_prev_size) == 0;
}
static CORE_ADDR debug_base; /* Base of dynamic linker structures */
@@ -587,7 +594,8 @@
read_memory (debug_base + lmo->r_map_offset, r_map_buf, lmo->r_map_size);
- lm = extract_address (r_map_buf, lmo->r_map_size);
+ /* Assume that the address is unsigned. */
+ lm = extract_unsigned_integer (r_map_buf, lmo->r_map_size);
/* FIXME: Perhaps we should validate the info somehow, perhaps by
checking r_version for a known version number, or r_state for
@@ -645,8 +653,9 @@
/* Read address of name from target memory to GDB. */
read_memory (lm + lmo->l_name_offset, l_name_buf, lmo->l_name_size);
- /* Convert the address to host format. */
- l_name = extract_address (l_name_buf, lmo->l_name_size);
+ /* Convert the address to host format. Assume that the address is
+ unsigned. */
+ l_name = extract_unsigned_integer (l_name_buf, lmo->l_name_size);
/* Free l_name_buf. */
do_cleanups (cleanups);
@@ -820,9 +829,9 @@
/* Read address of name from target memory to GDB. */
read_memory (lm + lmo->l_name_offset, l_name_buf, lmo->l_name_size);
- /* Extract this object's name. */
- name_address = extract_address (l_name_buf,
- lmo->l_name_size);
+ /* Extract this object's name. Assume that the address is
+ unsigned. */
+ name_address = extract_unsigned_integer (l_name_buf, lmo->l_name_size);
target_read_string (name_address, &buffer,
SO_NAME_MAX_PATH_SIZE - 1, &errcode);
make_cleanup (xfree, buffer);
@@ -843,9 +852,10 @@
return lm;
}
}
- /* Not the file we wanted, continue checking. */
- lm = extract_address (objfile_lm_info.lm + lmo->l_next_offset,
- lmo->l_next_size);
+ /* Not the file we wanted, continue checking. Assume that the
+ address is unsigned. */
+ lm = extract_unsigned_integer (objfile_lm_info.lm + lmo->l_next_offset,
+ lmo->l_next_size);
do_cleanups (old_chain);
}
return 0;