This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] alpha_register_reggroup_p
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 20:58:38 -0700
- Subject: Re: [RFA] alpha_register_reggroup_p
- References: <20030602032821.GA7199@twiddle.net> <3EDACA77.6050407@redhat.com>
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 11:54:31PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Should UNIQ be in save/restore (I don't know, I'm just asking)?
I really have no idea. As far as I can tell, the default
version just saved/restored all "real" registers, as opposed
to those "pseudos" constructed by gdb.
Is there some more specific meaning they should be interpreted with?
If this is "the set of registers not to be clobbered when gdb
does an inferior function call" I'd say, "probably".
r~