This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] varobj: call CHECK_TYPEDEF
- From: Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com" <gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: 11 Jun 2003 13:15:10 -0700
- Subject: Re: [RFA] varobj: call CHECK_TYPEDEF
- Organization:
- References: <1051215397.1538.43.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com> <3EA84A9B.5020308@redhat.com> <1051221433.1534.72.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com> <3EA8629B.50603@redhat.com>
On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 15:18, Andrew Cagney wrote:
So where do we stand with this? Shall I check it in and deal with the
fallout? (I need to go through and double-check all the typedef stuff in
varobj anyway, but at least this will allow users to use varobj, even if
it isn't cosmetically perfect.)
Keith
> > Index: insight219-b.cc
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: insight219-b.cc
> > diff -N insight219-b.cc
> > --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> > +++ insight219-b.cc 24 Apr 2003 21:54:00 -0000
> > @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
> > +#include "insight219.h"
> > +
> > +B::~B() {}
> > +
>
>
> > Index: insight219.cc
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: insight219.cc
> > diff -N insight219.cc
> > --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> > +++ insight219.cc 24 Apr 2003 21:54:00 -0000
> > @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> > +#include "insight219.h"
> > +
> > +int
> > +main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > +{
> > + B *b = new B();
> > + return 0;
> > +};
> > Index: insight219.h
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: insight219.h
> > diff -N insight219.h
> > --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> > +++ insight219.h 24 Apr 2003 21:54:00 -0000
> > @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> > +class B
> > +{
> > +public:
> > + virtual ~B();
> > +
> > +private:
> > + int b;
> > +};
>
>