This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [5.2.1] quiet warnings for gdbreplay.c

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, cagney at redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 13:53:12 -0400
Subject: Re: [5.2.1] quiet warnings for gdbreplay.c
References: <20020627204720.A13445@dragon.nuxi.com> <3D1C8AEF.5020508@ges.redhat.com> <20020628180820.GA9115@nevyn.them.org> <3D1CD337.2010205@ges.redhat.com> <20020628213904.GA15095@nevyn.them.org> <3D2B5212.3020302@ges.redhat.com> <20030621174002.GB14161@nevyn.them.org>

On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 05:13:54PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>Then do we want a separate gdb/gdbint/ directory for this?  I strongly
>prefer that headers shared between GDB and other directories be clearly
>marked and separated.  That'd give me a place to move
>gdb_proc_service.h, too.
I think it would be easier to just clarify the guidelines for ``gdb_XXXX.h'' files - that they be independant as they are included by GDB and friends.

Yea, ask eli about your @info.

Andrew

References:
- Re: [5.2.1] quiet warnings for gdbreplay.c
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]